User talk:73.146.183.85

Roman emperors' list
Hey there, I saw yout latest edits and I'm afraid I'm gonna have to revert them. The list is currently going through a featured list review, so this is certainly not the best time to start an edit war. I'll be honest, I also think the inclusion of those "regnal empresses" is a bit weird. If you are really turned off by that then I think it would be better to go to the talk page and discuss it with more people. That said, I do think that "usurpers" like Attalus should be included. Yes, the Senate was irrelevant by that point, but it has always been irrelevant, the Senate has always just followed whatever enssured their survival. Following your logic, we should also erase Romulus Augustulus, don't you think? I believe one of the best things about the English list is that it has a clear inclusion criteria that is followed al the way through, with the only exception being how co-emperors are treated, but that's another thing entirely. I know you have good intent, and I hope you understand. For now it's best to discuss those matters on the list's talk page. Tintero21 (talk) 23:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)