User talk:73.15.97.106

History-split query

 * See User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that in this edit to China Railway High-speed, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 04:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Line 10 (Shanghai Metro). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Editor D.S (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sockpuppet investigation
--  Dane talk  23:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * Saying "sorry" or "I won't do it again" isn't really convincing enough. What did you learn from your mistakes? How will you contribute to Wikipedia moving forward? --JustBerry (talk) 00:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * (follow up): I saw your unblock request modification, but I am not saying to say that in your unblock request. You should ideally answer those questions in a good amount of detail without simply saying "I understand." I'll leave the rest to you and the reviewing administrator. --JustBerry (talk) 01:05, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You continue to evade your block even after making these statements in the past so i'm a hard oppose for you getting unblocked. --  Dane talk  01:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 05:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)