User talk:73.178.126.242

December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 00:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 00:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 16:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of Illumination films. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

As an IP editor consider this as an additional warning as you may be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's policies, please add a source about a sequel to Secret Life of Pets or discuss it on the article's talk page -Gouleg🛋️ (Talk • Contribs) 16:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 20:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as done at List of Illumination films. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 20:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 22:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Epicgenius. Your recent edit(s) to the page TWA Hotel appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please refrain from changing correct dates of sources to incorrect dates, as you did here. In a similar vein, I suggest you don't describe as a 2001 film a movie with the words "2002 film" in its title unless you have a very good reason for doing so.'' Epicgenius (talk) 04:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at TWA Hotel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''You are now actually breaking reference URLs. Please stop.'' Epicgenius (talk) 19:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I reverted edits (similar to those Epicgenius reverted) on TWA Flight Center, where the NYT is very clear with a source reporting that AA ended in January 2002, and that the dispute over preservation was "as of" late 2002 (it was current as of the NYT article of 28 November 2002). KevinCuddeback (talk) 23:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Edgar Searle. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Template:AirTrain Newark have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Sorry for the inconvenience. Edgar Searle (talk) 23:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at AirTrain Newark and its template. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. So please, be careful. Thank you. Edgar Searle (talk) 00:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to, as you did at AirTrain Newark and its template, you may be blocked from editing. You must stop this instant. Edgar Searle (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at AirTrain Newark and its template. You are now actually blantly not following the guidelines. You must stop right now and I mean now this instant. Edgar Searle (talk) 23:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at AirTrain Newark and its template, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You must never do it again and I seriously 999999% mean it. Edgar Searle (talk) 23:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently removing content from AirTrain Newark and its template. This is never to happen again. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. Edgar Searle (talk) 01:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Vivo (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. BOVINEBOY 2008 13:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vivo (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. BOVINEBOY 2008 00:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vivo (film), you may be blocked from editing. BOVINEBOY 2008 00:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vivo (film). ''You are removing sourced content without explanation. You will be blocked if you continue in this pattern of editing.'' BOVINEBOY 2008 00:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. BusterD (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kidz Bop, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 11:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.