User talk:73.202.78.90

April 2019
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from University Laboratory High School (Urbana, Illinois) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 08:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University Laboratory High School (Urbana, Illinois). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 08:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at University Laboratory High School (Urbana, Illinois), you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 08:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Why is removing non-notable events from the page vandalism? I am the one who did a lot of the page organization. It is hardly vandalism.


 * Please read Notability (people).  Denisarona (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

This entry appears to fail the notability criteria listed. Under which one(s) did I miss where is passes?


 * They have Wikipedia articles. Denisarona (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

If that is the criterion, the section could easily be double the size. At a certain point, it becomes large enough to lose value and judgement about what is notable enough becomes relevant.

No reply? So who makes the call. I did a search, the section could easily triple or more under the "has an article" criterion.


 * If you think that there are more notable additions, then add them if you want. No reply? is a bit uncivilised as I don't spend all my time on Wikipedia, and I certainly don't spend all my time watching your talk page. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

No rudeness was intended. All of the previous replies were very quick. It looked like there was a notification service running. I was looking for an answer before I left for the night.

Are you suggesting that the page would be better if I added all of the alumni whom I thought had more notable contributions, and thus ended up with a huge list of mediocre contributions? That feesl counter productive compared to removing "won a reality show".


 * If someone is notable (minimum - have a Wikipedia article) then, if you want, you can spend your time adding them to the list. Your choice. Denisarona (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)