User talk:73.207.197.164

June 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nannaku Prematho. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: Please avoid using subjective and fluffy adjectives like "hefty", "untimely", "highly positive", etc. We shouldn't be editorializing in articles. Thanks.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brahmotsavam (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diffs: The "mixed to negative" summary of critical response you added is not supported by a reference. Whose specific voice are we quoting here? We don't cherrypick reviews and then summarize those cherrypicked reviews. That's how we wind up with biased articles, and as I have previously noted on your talk page, we aren't here to add our own opinions to articles. We also don't use blogs as references as anyone with an internet connection can call themselves a film reviewer. See also our reliable sourcing guidelines. Lastly, please poke around the archives of WikiProject Film. Phrases like "mixed to negative" and "mixed to positive" are meaningless and are generally shunned by the Wikipedia film community. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jai Lava Kusa has been reverted. Your edit here to Jai Lava Kusa was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/NTRArtsOfficial/status/852016227983609856) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Behen Hogi Teri, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: Don't add any more unsourced summaries of critical response, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

I have some very specific questions for you: What source described the box office take as "average"? What authoritative source decided that the critical response was "very positive"? And what exactly does "very positive" mean? How do you quantify that? How do you differentiate "very positive" from "mostly positive"? "Very positive" sounds like critics were shouting in the streets about how great it was, as opposed to there just being many positive reviews from critics. What source described the film's critical response as "mixed"? What source described the critical response as "generally positive"? That seems like a far way for a film to go, from "very positive" to "mixed" to "generally positive", especially if you happened to be looking at sources. In short, I have problems with all of these edits, because they seem entirely fabricated. Please note that I do expect answers to these questions, as I will very likely interrupt your editing privileges if you don't explain them satisfactorily. If you sense a bit of irritation in my tone, it's because you have a history of this sort of problematic editing. Also, note that per WP:PAID, if you are a paid editor, you must disclose who your client is, who is paying you, as well as any other relevant role or relationship. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Editor D.S. I noticed that in this edit to List of songs recorded by Chaitra H. G., you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Editor D.S (talk) 20:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reply
Hello. To write an edition summary, just type in the field in which is written Summary, log below the page. Regards! --Editor D.S (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)