User talk:73.221.224.126

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in The Emperor's New Groove, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Refer to MOS:BOLD AND MOS:BADEMPHASIS. If the sentence is not explicit enough rewrite it instead.'' (CC) Tb hotch ™ 17:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * This is one of those cases where the MOS doesn't adequately cover the situation. In this particular case, this is an emphasis inside a title, which is not directly addressed by the Manual of Style.  Therefore, there is not a prescribed direction here.  Because the ultimate goal is to create an encyclopedia that is accessible and easily read, it is more important to further what makes the most sense, rather than blindly adhere to an edge case within the Manual of Style.
 * This is what Ignore All Rules is all about. It is to give us the ability to deviate from mindless adherence to style when doing so makes common sense.
 * Now for this particular edit, the intent is to emphasize the change of title from "Kingdom of the Sun" to "Kingdom in the Sun". Given the highly similar names, the change is easily missed.  The original edit, the one you keep reverting to, did so by un-italicizing the word "in".  This is very hard to see in practice.  Therefore common sense indicated that more was needed.  Setting the Manual of Style aside, which one is easier to see the emphasis?
 * Kingdom in the Sun
 * Kingdom in the Sun
 * It's clear to me that the second one makes for a better edit, and therefore the better article, Manual of Style be damned.
 * Now, I would also like to discuss your edit summaries: if people is unable to read the difference it is not your problem. We don't emphazise words solely for convenience and wasn't that hard to do this, right?. Grammar and spelling aside, this hostile tone was somewhat uncalled for and rather uncivil.  Further, saying that an issue reading an article "is not my problem" is not how to create a better encyclopedia.  73.221.224.126 (talk) 08:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)