User talk:73.225.51.163

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Uyghur genocide. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (73.225.51.163) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vpab15&action=edit&section=new my talk page], or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Vpab15 (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Kuomintang
Yo, on the page for Counter-revolutionary you made an edit which brought up the Nazi Party out of nowhere when discussing Kuomintang. I don't know much about the subject, but it was a clearly spurious comparison that seemingly added nothing to the article other than an emotional appeal.

Now. I'm trying to assume good faith here. But that is an egregious NPOV violation. I've removed that line, but I'd appreciate if you could find some citations for some of the other claims about the party's history. Hppavilion1 (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Edit: oops you are sort of right that the line seems out of context, the section I was talking about below was actually from the article "reactionary". I've copied it over to the counterrevolutionary article and modified it to fit the new article, but that should now provide the context to that line in the China section that seemed out of place. Thanks. 73.225.51.163 (talk) 19:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I did not "bring up the Nazi Party out of nowhere", the article already mentioned them in a context that conflated their position. My rewording simply flushes out all of the ways in which they represented a counter-revolutionary "white" (as in "anti-red") force in power, and makes clear that despite having a personal dislike of the aristocracy and Prussian Junker class, and having a left-wing faction prior to the gaining state power end of Strasser and Rohm, that the Nazis worked, as any other Fascist movement does, to help counterrevolutionary forces consolidate power in the face of a revolutionary Communist threat. The previous wording almost makes it seem like the Nazis in power were in the middle ground between red and white, and gives credence to the idea that Fascism is a "third position" which was of course simply an idea of the previously-expelled Strasser's that was never actually practiced in power by any Fascist or defacto Fascist government, every one of which protected corporate, "white"/"anti-red", counterrevolutionary power. I'm not sure what the counterargument would be to restore the previously ambiguous and imprecise wording that leads the reader to draw an incorrect conclusion. 73.225.51.163 (talk) 19:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)