User talk:73.236.37.224

The joint DNI/DHS statement even said RE: the cyber attack/leak:

". . . are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow — the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europa and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."

"are consistent with the methods and motivations" is a far cry from "we've actual intelligence/evidence to support this theory" The real problem is that these methods/motivations are also consistent with several other state and non-state actors' tradecraft.

FBI/CIA/NSA/DISA or any other federal or LE agency had never examined the DNC servers. Only DNC-paid contractor Crowdstrike was given access, and it is their conclusion these 3/17 agencies based their statement on.

Furthermore, only FBI and CIA had actually reached that conclusion. NSA was only ~50% confident. DISA was not consulted, which is the standard agency who would conduct such an investigation within the federal government. This is 3 (2 1/2, technically) agencies. We have 17 intelligence agencies in the IC.

July 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stonewall Jackson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.