User talk:73.24.89.4

June 2021
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Hannah Stocking, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

It's an album with nu-disco, and electronic dance songs. It contains influences from disco along with 80's and 90's style music.

Improvements needed on VY Canis Majoris
The page says VY Canis Majoris is "1.2 kiloparsecs", but in fact it should say it's "approximately 1.2 kiloparsecs".

On the box, it says 1.17 kiloparsecs, which's a more reliable average distance of VY Canis Majoris from the Sun, but with the margins of errors, we can say on the line in the page outside of the box it's "approximately 1.2 kiloparsecs" instead of "1.2 kiloparsecs".

This would improve the accuracy of the page.

Plus the line "which leaves larger sizes published and in-date for other galactic and extragalactic red supergiants (and hypergiants) such as Westerlund 1-26, WOH G64, and Stephenson 2-18" should be changed to "which leaves larger sizes published and in-date for other galactic and extragalactic red supergiants (and hypergiants) such as WOH G64, UY Scuti, and Stephenson 2-18" since Westerlund 1-26 now has smaller radii estimates involved despite the estimates being uncertain (like those sizes or larger) and UY Scuti's still estimated to be 1708 +/- 192 x the Sun's radius since the GAIA parallax for it is considered unreliable due to the large amount of astrometric noise.

People going on pages like these should agree that the statements on each page makes sense and is up to date.

August 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Atomic (song). Binksternet (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

The definition of disco vs post-disco.
The song It's Raining Men came out in 1982 and disco was dealt a fatal decline by public backlash in 1979 (known as Disco Demolition Night), and in the wake, genres like post-disco and its derivatives were made. Yet on the paragraphs, it defines the song correctly, a post-disco song, but on the box, it says it's disco. These differences in statements can confuse users reading pages like this (It's Raining Men by the Weather Girls).

March 2022
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kingda Ka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Eclipse cycle
Hello 73.24.89.4! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Eclipse cycle, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~gent0113/eclipse/eclipsecycles_cycles.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Eclipse cycle and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Eclipse cycle, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Eclipse cycle. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Eclipse cycle with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Eclipse cycle saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC).