User talk:73.244.90.97

April 2018
Your recent editing history at 49 Days shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.please do not used trivia, trivia is not encyclopedia, if you wish block Wikipedia edit war so stop it or you continued war I will report you. Oripaypaykim (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

From the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TRIVIA webpage:

"Trivia sections should not simply be removed from articles in all cases." "It may be possible to integrate some items into the article text." "Any speculative or factually incorrect entries should be removed," "This guideline does not suggest removing trivia sections, or moving them to the talk page. If information is otherwise suitable, it is better that it be poorly presented than not presented at all." "a selectively populated list with a relatively narrow theme is not necessarily trivia, and can be the best way to present some types of information."

The information I have provided appears to be the FIRST TIME it's been noticed ANYWHERE on the internet (at least in the English language). Nothing I have done violates or enters into a gray-area of Wikipedia's policies. Perhaps your understanding of the Trivia section is incomplete and you require a refresher by actually re-reading that section, instead of merely quoting it?

As I have previously stated and as the TRIVIA page states, perhaps that information (since it's verifiable as correct) could be integrated into the page itself, instead of being deleted out of hand by the two of you?73.244.90.97 (talk) 03:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)