User talk:73.247.167.37

April 2023
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rishi Shah—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 21:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * how is it not constructive? The page is sourced, and everything mentioned on the page has been shown in court to be fraudulent. 73.247.167.37 (talk) 21:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rishi Shah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * how is it vandalism? The source is cited in the legal problems section. How is this any different from Elizabeth Holmes? 73.247.167.37 (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)