User talk:73.67.145.182

September 2018
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Lawrence M. Krauss, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lawrence M. Krauss. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lawrence M. Krauss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

hi.. Sorry. I was not familiar with these rules.. after I made the original edit and was told to reference a source, I went back and edited and added the relevant reference. The original statement in the page was vague and slightly misleading, and did not make it clear that the claim referred to an event in Australia and not at ASU. It also did not elaborate on the fact that the University used a "more likely than not" method of determination, and also that the complaint was not made by the woman in question. All of these facts are clear in the document referenced. So I thought it was appropriate to add the detail along with the reference 73.67.145.182 (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)