User talk:73.71.226.52

March 2020
Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sophisti-pop, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Matt, I highly reccomend you ligthen up. In such a topic with a new niche term, do you really think there are enough articles attributing these artists as hayving been named "sophisti-pop???" For cryingoutloud, I made an effort to help others seeking more music, and you shat upon.

Thank goodness you have saved the world from volunteer gifts of information. Please "remove" yourself and "archive" yourself from taking further actions of this sort as you clearly cannot discern a gift of simple, logical, quality - and you've got your ego ahead of your sense. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.71.226.52 (talk • contribs) 11:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm sure your edits were well-intentioned but a fundamental tenet of Wikipedia is that it does not carry original research. If there are no "articles (or other reliable sources) attributing" whatever you believe to be the case, it doesn't have a place here unless and until you do. Unsupported material is no "gift". Whether intentionally or not, you claimed that your additions were supported by a source which did not in fact support them. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)