User talk:73.75.214.194

May 2021
Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fiat G.55 Centauro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Brewster F2A Buffalo, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 20:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * To clarify, adding a calculated value such as aspect ratio without a source providing the number is to be avoided at all costs - wikipedia only reflects what the sources provide - we cannot add beyond that.&#32;- NiD.29 (talk) 04:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Routine_calculations ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ READ THE ABOVE

Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the result of the calculation is obvious, correct, and a meaningful reflection of the sources. Basic arithmetic, such as adding numbers, converting units, or calculating a person's age are some examples of routine calculations. See also Category:Conversion templates.


 * Except that is NOT a routine calculation by any stretch of the imagination. The only routine calculations we do are those handled by a conversion template. Also, please sign your comments. &#32;- NiD.29 (talk) 06:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Obnoxious behaviour.
Where the **** do you get off undoing someone else's edits on their own talk page? Aside from your repeated refusal to follow ANY of even the most basic social norms on Wikipedia (including something as simple as signing your posts), then you have the gall to undo my own edits on my own page? Seriously dude, you not only aren't correct, you aren't even rational. IF there was any need for a calculated number, it would be appropriate to have the template make the calculation, not allow it to be done manually, since substantial experience has shown that not everyone will even get basic math right, and that discussion was already completed and a conclusion reached. Not cool.&#32;- NiD.29 (talk) 07:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:NiD.29, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 00:44, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Just more childish vandalism consistent with this user's utter inability and unwillingness to follow any social norms or rules. Thanks for reverting the latest vandalism Bilcat.&#32;- NiD.29 (talk) 07:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)