User talk:73.88.19.36

I apologize for adding the three citations from Poker News. Is that not reliable enough? (They were listed in the “News” section of Google.)

A fourth citation about poker websites’ rules was directly from a poker website’s rules. I would think that would be a primary source?


 * Hi. No apology necessary! Please do read the notes on my edit summaries. Also, let's discuss this on the talk page for the article. That way other editors can weigh in, too. I already started a discussion there.


 * Some pages on PokerNews might be reliable sources, but definitely not the "review" of GGPoker. That's basically just a long advertisement for GGPoker. The bigger problem is that none of the sources you're including support the statements. If you want to say that "most" sites do this, a link to a page that says "GGPoker" doesn't support this claim. The other page was better, but it still didn't support the claim.


 * But yeah, let's definitely discuss on the talk page for the article rather than here. Rray (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Man, you are a good-send…thank you for your patience with me! I didn’t realize that the site was so scammy (not reliable). Whoops! Again, I’m about that.

There is a mention of the poker websites banning cheaters for using programs in the New York Times: “How A.I. Conquered Poker“. New York Times. Keith Romer. Jan. 18, 2022, 11:00 a.m. ET. https://web.archive.org/web/20220118163757/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/18/magazine/ai-technology-poker.html


 * Ooh! Nice find. I'll add it tomorrow morning. It's late here. Well, it's late for a man my age, anyway. :) Feel free to add it yourself, though -- I want to encourage you to be bold with your edits. Rray (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

I won’t place it on the Wikipedia page, but if you think it’s a good citation, perhaps you could put it in?

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Computer poker player, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi 73.88.19.36! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Rray (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Citations 2
I apologize for adding the three citations from Poker News. Is that not reliable enough? (They were listed in the “News” section of Google.)

A fourth citation about poker websites’ rules was directly from a poker website’s rules. I would think that would be a primary source? 73.88.19.36 (talk) 03:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

New York Times article
There’s a great article in The New York Times that could be used for citations: New York Times. “How A.I. Conquered Poker.” Keith Romer. Jan. 18, 2022, 11:00 a.m. ET. https://web.archive.org/web/20220118163757/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/18/magazine/ai-technology-poker.html

The article mentions online poker websites banning people for using computer program for Real Time Assistance. (It’s probably good for citing other things on the page, too).

I didn’t put in on the Wikipedia page because I thought it might be good to discuss it first. (Then someone else can use put it in the article, if you think it’s appropriate.) :-) 73.88.19.36 (talk) 03:37, 14 February 2023 (UTC)