User talk:73.9.240.200

November 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Flesh-n-Bone, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flesh-n-Bone. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Flesh-n-Bone, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 04:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The information that is in that article is not factual. Alot of what is said in there has no proof other than being on a website which again has no factual evidence. Please keep that down until we are able to put actual facts there. 73.9.240.200 (talk) 04:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read what a conflict of interest is. Multiple editors have restored the content. This is objectively disruptive. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This is not a conflict of interest, the things that are posted in the legal article are all wrong and not factual. The artist had mentioned this too. If you did some research you yourself would see. What is your deal here? 73.9.240.200 (talk) 04:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This isn't my deal. There is an established process for the subject of an article that wants changes made to an existing article. You can read about that here: The information in your article about me is wrong. How can I get it fixed? Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 73.9.240.200. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Flesh-n-Bone, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Levelselect. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)