User talk:73.9.246.27

I noticed you contributed recently to the page John Lewis Voting Rights Act. First, thanks for contributing. Some of your edits I reverted because they did not appear to be in line with Wikipedia policies. I am including some here to help clarify. First, Wikipedia relies on reliable sources and not on editors' individual commentary, so all statements in articles ought to be sourced (see WP:RS and WP:NOR). Second, Wikipedia includes material based on Verifiability, not truth, meaning that material should always be based on what reliable sources say even if an individual editor may disagree. Finally, articles should be written from a neutral point of view, so it's important to be careful to describe sourced material in a neutral tone. I am happy to discuss more if needed. Fiwec81618 (talk) 03:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Lewis Voting Rights Act, you may be blocked from editing. aaronneallucas (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to John Lewis Voting Rights Act. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Marleeashton (talk) 01:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at John Lewis Voting Rights Act. Marleeashton (talk) 08:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)