User talk:7336jeremy

November 2023
Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Fisher & Paykel. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there,
 * I hear where you're coming from but I had replaced the original source the 2007 Annual Report by Fisher and Paykel which also wasnt available as an archive from Wayback, with the more recent 2010 Annual Report. It didn;t make sense to keep the citation, honestly I think the whole sentence should be deleted, as it adds one weirdly specific detail in an entry that is otherwise quite general and vague.  7336jeremy (talk) 07:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)