User talk:74.105.229.251

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, new to Wikipedia editing and I don't know the ins and outs.

I posted this on my talk page: Removed this item completely. It is irrelevant to the current events of the orchestra, and thus belongs in the history section. If someone would like to rewrite an appropriate scope in the history section, in relation to the decades that the orchestra has produced concerts, please do so. But, this should never have been HALF of an entire Wikipedia article for an organization. While appropriately cited, it is clear that the person doing so is attempting to make the organization look bad. Time to let go.

I do believe that someone is intent on defaming the orchestra and consistently trying to paint the organization in a negative tone on Wikipedia. As I stated above, the Golden Age Collection section is now a historical reference, and belongs in the history section with a scope that is relevant to the many other events - mostly positive, some negative. But, half of an organization's Wikipedia page should not be dedicated to news articles about one single event in the entire history of the organization. Also, the history section has been rewritten numerous times--each time with an emphasis toward the negative, and removal of positive items "due to PR-like" language. Well, the latter is not true. The PR-like language that was removed included cited items.