User talk:74.127.219.8

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Willa's Wild Life, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Willa's Wild Life was changed by 74.127.219.8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915347 on 2011-07-20T04:29:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Your edit to Wild Kratts was redacted due to unverified sources. Please verify the source of your information to prevent further redactions in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmallCheez (talk • contribs) 02:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wild Kratts with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Arnavchaudhary (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SmallCheez (talk) 03:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

How to get along
Hi there, I'm an admin at Wikipedia. Your enthusiasm on the Wild Kratts is to be applauded, however at Wikipedia we try to work cooperatively. I've noticed you seem to be persisting with your opinion and not discussing it with the other editors when it comes to making changes. We also require information to be reliably sourced. You may believe you know something about the show, but none of our opinions are valid, we all need external references.

So anyway I'll be watching the page for a while. All admins have a fair amount of power in terms of being able to block people from editing if people don't play by the rules, however I'd really prefer to not have to do that. Regards Manning (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Wild Kratts. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 09:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wild Kratts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TeaDrinker (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I've blocked you from editing for the next two days, since you continue to add unsourced content to the Wild Kratts article. If you have a source for that information, please discuss it on the talk page. I am also happy to remove the block to discuss your edits on the article talk page. Please leave a note here if you have any questions or concerns. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)