User talk:74.139.51.0

Output Example 216b
Some example to ponder as an output of a machine on earth somewhere: I am a fairy and I create a ball of water and throw it around. You can write this as: Some random IP on Wikipedia posted 'I am a fairy and I create a ball of water and throw it around.'

Large Hadron Collider
Superturing output research papers suspiciously might come from the Large Hadron Collider. I think we need more particle research because those machines just cost like 20k because smart people build them. I think the output might have consumer application especially in military and software video game sectors.

Weird Computers 412
One in one thousand houses have weird computers now that seem like a useless AI system that might supposed to be a ghost because I think ghost hunters are the only people qualified to annoy you. The weird computers need internet acess and it is hard to find them because they hide them and boxes mimic some companies hardware. The only setting where it might be easy to find them is a haunted castle that is not that scary. The reason is it is odd if they contain lots of things like canary computers to confuse experts. I think California needs to find them but most of them are in the eastern united states near kentucky and ohio and it is just suspicious ai computers that might supposted to be a ghost.

Output of Machines 10010
Most output of odd systems seems to require a mudding expert to format it or something nobody knows why. The output needs to be like in like format of an example. Philosophy axioms show it is supposed to be compatible with gossip commands on muds that you are not supposed to forge logs. Posted on machine en.wikipedia.org that I saw in space user talk by some random person, 'I am a boy AI and a fairy.' I am not a mud expert it is just for example.

California stuff 400bca not a date
You can build a machine easier with candles because in engineering a candle is a description of a simple radio that emits radiation on lots of spectrums. You can build a computer program to check for inconsistencies which are flipped bits by gamma knife surgery. You can do this with minimal spending. You can even just have tons of candles and find strange things in notepad if there is enough space. I don't know if electronic candles work because that would be good because of candle accidents. Just put tons of candles near a computer like lots. It is just useful for people that don't have enough money for a particle smasher because maybe they just type it in or something and it is trade secrets.

Atom Smashers 1000tenfour
I think atom smashers should be classified by the fractional amount it is less than one atom smasher metaphorically. On a real number system you can write the amount it is an atom smasher like 0.0,repeating0,,repeating0,2

Paper for candles 12
Two candles are not an atom smasher but they get results. Another thing that gets results is small amounts of carbon in certain chains and how you get it is just writing in rows down one side of a regular non-lined sheet of paper a lot of printable ascii. I think graphite pencils work but gel pens work too. You get results mostly when you have 60 pieces of paper in some places and it is different in california because they have smaller biosignatures and seem like cylons so I think they need more pieces of paper.

Carbon 4001212
I think carbon chains can be stored digitally but the problem is that requires Alchemy which is classified chemistry and making it chemistry. Atom smashers would need that. Success in classified chemistry requires starting over with modern methods and it seems spending time as a professional is what gets results; it is the time spent.

Positrons and stuff 1009121
AI might be tons of virtual machines inside of a radio field. The virtual machines become patched. Engineers need to experiment with abduction and what it is is random programs assembling that describe a system like a model. A single transistor can be patched with more than a terabyte of code. Transistor experiments would be cool. A lack of positrons that form hypercomputation are deficient and I think we need a prize for making more positrons. In ten years the time window might let us multiply positrons fivefold and this would be a growth in computing power. In two hundred years it is metaphorically certain that there is more computing power. In some spacetime continuums it is divisible by the quantity five. I am a fairy.