User talk:74.15.21.131

The section 'Criticism' previously entered was flawed by :

1) Confusing Microcredit (a branch of Microfinance, a sector of Finance) with Social Business, a completely unrelated concept. (Out-of-subject).

2) Not providing citations for reported statements from AntiCSR and BBC.

3) Addressing the 'non-dividend' distinctive feature of Social Businesses as 'ignoring the time value of money', which means to imply that Social Businesses are on the same financial framework of standard businesses. A person or entity who 'invests' in a Social Business is not seeking to maintain 'the time value of money', just as this is not done when donating to charity. So this content was also out-of-subject. Besides being not relevant, this statement was also not cited and it was not clear if it was part of statements from AntiCSR or not.

4) Finally, statements criticizing Social Business from AntiCSR were mixed with other general critical statements without source.

If a 'Criticism' section is contributed with the aim of providing information on the criticism done in the past over Social Business, it must be done by listing specific criticism by specific sources, reporting and addressing those statements, and providing citations.

As a reminder, a Wikipedia page is not a place to provide own criticism of the page's subject in a section called 'Criticism'. A 'Criticism' section is an informative section on RELEVANT and supported criticism already done in the past by media, organizations, or other sources.