User talk:74.202.50.125

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

Regarding this edit of yours: it's certainly true that AFBF "has a broad range of policy issues" and wikipedia can and should cover that range. But deleting sourced, relevant content is not the proper way to deal with this deficiency. Instead, you and anyone else who might be interested are more than welcome to flesh the article, and describe the other things that AFBF work ons. But for any subject of a wikipedia article--including AFBF--noteworthy controversies involving the subject as well as the subject's reception in the media are always appropriate things to discuss within the article, as long as they are described neutrally. See WP:NPOV for more information on this. Yilloslime T C  01:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)