User talk:74.51.202.254

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brigitte Bardot was changed by 74.51.202.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907076 on 2013-02-01T16:59:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Höllviken was changed by 74.51.202.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957144 on 2013-02-05T16:54:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Pharaoh of the Wizards. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hiram Rhodes Revels, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clara Barton. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Glogster, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yinta n   15:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glogster with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Yinta n  15:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mold, you may be blocked from editing. Sideways713 (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New Deal, Texas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sideways713 (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2013 (UTC)