User talk:74.51.78.148

August 2021
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Love Parade (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to King Crimson, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 23:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Scott Shriner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 23:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jangle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''I found only one mention of "jangle pop" in the book. The second source is a blog, and therefore not a reliable source.'' Donald Albury 23:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at I Know There's Something Going On, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Simon & Garfunkel. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 18:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dance music. Binksternet (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

September 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Impression That I Get has been reverted. Your edit here to The Impression That I Get was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.reddit.com/r/Ska/comments/2h69y5/til_the_theme_for_americas_funniest_home_videos/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Election ratings
Hello, please do not add any more ratings/predictions, extrapolated from news articles. Those are not ratings. They should have a standardized system in predicting every elections or, at the very least, actually state explicitly whether the election is a "tossup"/"lean" etc. And if you're in doubt, please just use the article's talk page or add a message to editors like me. Thanks. — twotwofourtysix (talk &#124;&#124; edits) 12:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Running Up That Hill. Binksternet (talk) 00:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sunny and 75, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)