User talk:74.65.13.0

January 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deadpool (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I’m not changing anything I’m just adding more words. 74.65.13.0 (talk) 05:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Deadpool (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Newt Scamander, you may be blocked from editing. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 17:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

New message from InfiniteNexus
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Deadpool (film) § Unsourced/unexplained edit. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jessie (2011 TV series). Lflin16 - Member of Recent Changes Patrol (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 9 (2009 animated film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Augend (drop a line) 05:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * What I did was right because it needed more words and been doing the same thing to other articles. 74.65.13.0 (talk) 03:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No, the phrase was grammatically correct before you edited it. Put it in a grammar checker and see for yourself. Augend  (drop a line) 03:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)