User talk:74.67.45.185

December 2020
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that in this edit to Sheldon Silver, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 06:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The removed content has again been removed, this time with a longer explanation. The first explanation was completely clear. 74.67.45.185 (talk) 06:54, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay. I think so. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any questions.Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 06:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nita Lowey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ashley yoursmile!  14:36, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * Ashley yoursmile!, what are you talking about? My edits were constructive and much-needed. The article is a mess and has been for quite some time, judging by the template messages posted there. What concerned you about my edits? Please take your concerns to the article talk page before posting unnecessary warnings here. Thank you. 74.67.45.185 (talk) 14:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ken Wahl, you may be blocked from editing.   — Yours, Berrely  (🎅 Ho ho ho! 🎄) • Talk∕Contribs 18:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Berrely, I stand by the edits I made to that page and I take issue with the warning you posted. 74.67.45.185 (talk) 18:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Everything You Want (Vertical Horizon song) has been reverted. Your edit here to Everything You Want (Vertical Horizon song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/Vertical-Horizon-Everything-You-Want/release/368471) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Courtesy ANI FYI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Val Kilmer have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Val Kilmer was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.angelfire.com/ca2/safari/icon5.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dean Skelos—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Freak scene. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Materialscientist, removing unsourced content that has been tagged for eight years is not an unconstructive edit. It's a much-needed edit. Please stop putting silly warnings on my talk page. 19:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The whitewashing and removal of sourced material on Pete Domenici is not accompanied by discussion on the talk page. Please stop removing large chunks of material, especially referenced, prior to such consensus. Ifnord (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * There was no whitewashing, Ifnord. I removed one sentence that was redundant. I removed a section because it was entirely sourced to advocacy organizations. You should review WP:AGF before posting accusations on my talk page again. 74.67.45.185 (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * IP, I took a look at some of your edits and most of them seem fine and made in good-faith. I think many of these warnings seem quite unwarranted. I have no clue how this edit can be consided to be vandalism.  As a suggestion, it would be best to use the talk page before you make a controversial removal of sourced content. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 12:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Dr. Swag Lord, thank you for your post and for your suggestion. Both are appreciated. 74.67.45.185 (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm User3749. I noticed that you recently removed content from NCIS: Los Angeles without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. User3749 (talk) 04:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * I have added a more detailed explanation of the edit. 74.67.45.185 (talk) 05:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SunCrow Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)