User talk:74.70.146.1

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Articles for deletion/Electron internal structure. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (74.70.146.1) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Iazyges (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm 0xF8E8. I noticed that in this edit to Israel–Palau relations, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —0xF8E8 (talk) 03:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Response
I've responded to you on my talk page. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  02:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Sunni Tehreek
Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

science writing
Thus is what it is

Slatersteven (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Eperoton. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Sharia that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eperoton (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Ten Lost Tribes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Ten Lost Tribes
You removed sourced content. The reason was not justification. Jim1138 (talk) 10:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:SimonTrew. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Your recent editing history at Ten Lost Tribes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Rapa Nui
Perhaps you would deign to explain in the FT/N discussion why Science, PNAS and Current Biology are not accepptable mainstream sources. Agricolae (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Rev/del request
Sorry, forgot this. I looked at it and couldn't understand the problem. What did I miss? Doug Weller talk 19:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Doug Weller talk 10:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bartholomew I of Constantinople
Since I can't use the "thank you" button with an IP user, thanks. Good call. Dr.  K.  03:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Talk:Peter Gunn (song), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Your recent editing history at Dingir shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Akocsg (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Reported
You have been reported here for edit-warring. Akocsg (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Argead dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dr.  K.  02:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
 * There is more about this dispute on the help Desk.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  22:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)