User talk:74.76.164.230

Welcome
If you are going to add content to an article, particularly to a biography of a living person, you will need to cite your sources. We don't accept original research on wikipedia. So the source has to have the same conclusion as what you write (but paraphrased in your own words). IRWolfie- (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Peter Green (historian)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Phantom Tech (talk) 23:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to College of Saint Rose—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Asartea  Talk  undefined  Contribs  05:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Asartea, this information is included elsewhere in the article. 74.76.164.230 (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That might be the case but it also fits perfectly there  Asartea  Talk  undefined  Contribs  06:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Claudia Tenney did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. KNHaw  (talk)  05:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit-warring
You are edit-warring at Ken Wahl. Per WP:BRD, protocol after being reverted the first time is to go to the article's talk page and try to reach consensus with other editors. Instead, you re-reverted. I would also note that you are editing under two different aliases, this IP and 74.67.45.185. If you continue edit-warring rather than discussing on the talk page, admin intervention will be required.--Tenebrae (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Thisisnotcam. I noticed that you recently removed content from Conservative Democrats without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Hi! I'd recommend building consensus on the talk page before blanking a section, per WP:CON.'' ɯ ɐ ɔ  💬 04:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thisisnotcam, what are you talking about? 74.76.164.230 (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * My edit summary said, "remove dubious and tagged listing of Woodrow Wilson, who was a progressive." I think that explanation is perfectly adequate. You are entitled to disagree, but posting a notice on a user page about an inadequate explanation is uncalled-for. Please delete. 74.76.164.230 (talk) 04:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, this was specifically re: the blanking of the mention of Woodrow Wilson, like you brought up -- while there was a tag, the section had ample sourcing and there wasn't any consensus built on the talk page, which should probably be done before just outright deleting a section like that. This isn't a point of whether I agree/disagree, but more that there should at least be a good faith attempt for consensus prior to deletion, or finding sourcing. Also not a comment on your editing skills! I just wanted to let you know why I reverted the edit itself. Hopefully this helps?  ɯ ɐ ɔ  💬 04:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Neil Young
Nice edit on the Neil Young article. That is a much better section header. Thanks! Joyous! Noise! 02:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! 74.76.164.230 (talk) 02:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)