User talk:74.88.32.47

Poindexter
For the millionth time, because it claimed that this businessman and ranch-owner had somehow declared a cause of death, which he cannot do. He's not a doctor. He's not a medical examiner. He's not the judge who eventually declared a cause of death. Why are all you suspiciously similar anon IPs not getting this? --Tenebrae (talk) 23:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I do not know why you feel an unanswered question regarding John B. Poindexter being re-asked is suspicious. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Unanswered? I've answered it multiple times. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You never did answer the question. No one was on scene to pronounce Scalia dead. Poindexter discovered the body. also what is "suspiciously similar anon IPs"? I only accidentally posted from firefox but post as User:Optim.usprime 74.88.32.47 (talk) 07:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Now you're just trolling. I answer the question in the very first post above. Also, thank you for confirming my accurate suspicion.--Tenebrae (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No you don't answer my question. Regardless of the Poindexter article, the man who found Scalia's body is worth mentioning in the article as the man who found Scalia's body, which you have deleted. That Poindexter is a very prominent & wealthy ranch owner and winner of a Presidential Citation Medal for his bravery in Vietnam is what makes his article noteworthy. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 20:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Interestingly, Eugene Scalia & John B. Poindexter appear "nominated for deletion" by Tenebrae, while a user's own talk page cannot be blanked on his watch.. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 09:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Dave Brockie

 * Under your registered username User:Optim.usprime, you have been blocked indefinitely for your harassing and trolling. If you continue under your IP address, I am contacting an admin. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Dude. This isn't cool. Dave Brockie is dead. I, User:Optim.usprime, have never edited Dave Brockie's page, but having read what you wrote, claiming WP:BLP is in play is pretty cruel considering Dave's death (hence, not living). His death "by a band member" is only sourced as "heroin overdose" or "drug overdose" with 1 dead link from Glen Taylor's paper.. You're trying to claim Dave's father isn't William Brockie because of a violation of verifiability? Gwar's manager said "A full autopsy will be performed". If the autopsy did not confirm initial diagnoses, it should be cited. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 09:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, here's your verifiability. Since apparently I am not allowed to add this to his article, please do so. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm a little confused: The article says, "Brockie was survived by his father, William Brockie" and has a whole paragraph about the lawsuit. So what do you want to add?-- Tenebrae (talk) 23:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * For a user that fervently brags about quantity of edits, your deletion of "Brockie was survived by his father, William Brockie.." a total of 7 times is vandalism, regardless of a different user rectifying the error. That you tally 7 edits of vandalism as a small piece of a bragging point is quite odd, so i'm also confused.


 * more constructively, the 1st paragraph of Dave Brockie is a mess. The only link to "the cause of death was determined to be a heroin overdose" is a dead link. An autopsy was performed. The results of the autopsy should be included. And the vague language surrounding Dave's death and the purported circumstances in the entire first paragraph, with the exception of the last sentence, really don't explain anything. New developments are worth adding and more clarity towards the circumstances is needed since the present explanation is unencyclopedic. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 01:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * You know, I tried to be helpful, and you continue to insult me. For the last time, it's not vandalism to remove uncited personal claims about living people. In fact, we're required to do so. Dave Brockie's father and his purported fiancee are living people and you never gave a footnoted citation for your claims. Another editor properly cited the father. Why don't you read WP:BLP before insulting someone and making baseless accusations. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * note:Dave Brockie is dead, the specific sentence deleted dealt with the aftermath of his death..
 * note2:It still wasn't me, User:Optim.usprime, who made those edits from this ip


 * I have read BLP. Dave Brockie is still dead. Further, I did not insult you, I insulted your 7 edits deleting a statement you yourself acknowledge was at least partially if not entirely true. So I do not accept that as the reason you are ignoring the more important point made that the first paragraph of Dave Brockie contains vague and unsourced information. The editor who added the truth that Dave was survived by his father Will, when using this ip, was still reverted by you 7 times, which was only worth mentioning because this ip was blocked as a result of those abrasive edits. I recommend you read WP:CRV: "When information is unsourced, AND IT IS DOUBTFUL ANY SOURCES ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE INFORMATION, it CAN be boldly removed". You still removed "Brockie was survived by his father, William Brockie.." a total of 7 times despite a basic google search easily fetching that information. Unsourced information goes further within WP:CRV (which you should probably re-read) when noting that questionable information should be tagged with rather than be removed. Verifiability/Removal of Uncited Material specifically does not qualify you to make an immediate removal as you did, 7 times, while WP:OR applies much more definitively to other parts of the article, which have been unaddressed. Had you not asked for this ip to be banned, it would not have come up.


 * More constructively, and to your point that we ought "remove uncited personal claims", please remove and rework the entire first paragraph of Dave Brockie. Since his autopsy was performed, no source has confirmed his death of an overdose nor is the vague language surrounding those reporting his death encyclopedically written. 74.88.32.47 (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)