User talk:74.95.29.249

April 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Barrier island, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 14:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Empire of Japan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Empire of Japan was changed by 74.95.29.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956348 on 2012-05-04T19:06:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

November 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frölunda HC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kimberly Clarice Aiken has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kimberly Clarice Aiken was changed by 74.95.29.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938998 on 2015-09-17T12:43:44+00:00.

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Megamind has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Megamind was changed by 74.95.29.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909239 on 2015-09-24T20:10:35+00:00.

March 2022
Hello, I'm Pavlov2. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Harry Saltzman—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Pavlov2 (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:American Independence Museum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pavlov2 (talk) 07:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to English folklore—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm SkyWolf369. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Zilpha Keatley Snyder have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sky The Wolf (Talk) 14:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zilpha Keatley Snyder. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)