User talk:74.96.188.12

Persistant PulseView ‎/ Quarktet Promotion
http://.Quarktet.com
 * Accounts

Hello,. You may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest including WP:NOPAY. All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People with a close connection to a subject need to be aware of Wikipedia's policies;


 * Conflict of interest
 * Paid advocacy, public relations, and marketing
 * Advertising and conflicts of interest (External Linking)
 * Editors who have a conflict of interest
 * Accounts used for promotion
 * Law Of Unintended Consequences
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view. You may also wish to avoid giving the impression that your account is to be used for promotional purposes. Regardless, doing so does not exempt you from compliance with Wikipedias policies.

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Hu12 (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Response to Hu12
Dear Editor,

I do appreciate your efforts in safeguarding wikipedia from blatant advertising. The PulseView program competitor of a program called Origin and a program called SigmaPlot. Both of these programs have wikipedia pages. As these pages were deem allowable by wikipedia editors, the Pulseview page was created. The Pulseview page was them deemed unallowable. I did not see the difference between the two approaches. Since those pages had a listing of competing software, I added the link to the PulseView page. The link was harmless given these companies provided the space. I have read your guidelines but from my perspective they are not being evenly administired.

Best Regards, JimC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjcaron (talk • contribs) 16:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The nature of Wikipedia means that you can't make a convincing argument based on what PulseView program competitor does or does not exist; Pointing out that PulseView program competitors exist does not prove that PulseView should also exist.
 * A few established Wikipedia policies;
 * Confilct of interest
 * Advertisements masquerading as articles
 * External link spamming
 * Links normally to be avoided
 * Advertising and conflicts of interest
 * Accounts used for promotion
 * Law Of Unintended Consequences
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Wikipedia is not a repository for links
 * BLOCK (accounts that appear, based on their edit history, to exist for the sole or primary purpose of promoting a person, company, product, service, or organization.)
 * Your contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote yourself and PulseView which is never appropriate, particularly when it there is a conflict of interest as it violates Neutrality (a fundamental principle by which Wikipedia operates). --Hu12 (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2013 (UTC)