User talk:74.96.6.251

September 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Talk:North American Aerospace Defense Command, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Continued. - BilCat (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC) POV pushing by a banned user using an IP to avoid block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I request that you unblock me! Your action is contrary to Wikepedia rules. You have blatantly avoided my correction of the NORAD page dealing with 9/11. The Wikipedia citation misrepresents the source it uses, and furthermore, The 9/11 Commission Report throws cold water on the whole citation's material. The 9/11 Commission Report on page 18 says that NORAD monitored ALL aircraft on 9/11. What you call disruptive edits are actually facts from The 9/11 Commission Report, not lies from NORAD. Why do you not respond to verifiable errors on Wikipedia? Why do you not assist me in correcting Wikipedia?

Do you work for NORAD? If so, then you have a conflict of interest here. If you don't work for NORAD then what is your problem? -- BilCat,

I've made no disruptive edits as you call them because no one is allowed to correct the NORAD page. Why do you continue to allow the erroneous assertion that NORAD didn't monitor all aircraft over American airspace on 9/11? It isn't even what NORAD says in the NORAD source you cite! The 9/11 Commission Report on page 18 says NORAD monitored all aircraft over America on 9/11, and on pages 27 and 28 the commission report says NORAD was actually tracking Flight 77 and Delta 1989, respectively. Why won't you correct the NORAD page? I've made it easy for you by giving the pertinent page numbers in The 9/11 Commission Report. The passages don't even cover half a page in the report.


 * Sorry, Dean, I'm busy planning a Koran-burning party for the late morning in honor of the peaceful religion of Islam. - BilCat (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * As equal-oppurtunity protesters, we will be burning Korans in honor of the liberation of the ancient cities of Ephesus, Constantinople, Antiooch, and Alexandria from the oppressive rule of the Christians in the 600s CE. Those cities had been conquered by Chritian armies in the First Century AD, led by great warriors such as Peter, Paul, and John, but were liberagted by peaceful marchers from Mecca and Medina who spread the Good News of Submission to Allah by laying flowers in the streets, after which the Christians in those cities killed themselves in shame for their heinous acts. We'll also be honoring hte many millions of Musilms who marched in protest of the 9/11 attacks, especially those in Palestine. We were touched by their cries of anguish at how their religion was being misused to kill Americans and others on that day. Finally, we're honoring all those Musilms freedom fighters in Iraq and Afghanistan for there peaceful bombings of other Muslims, demostrating how much Muslims love there own fellow followers of the Religion of Peace.

Finally, we'll be burning copies of The 9/11 Commission Report to honor great patrots like you for telling the world the truth of how the Bush Administration told lies about the peacful religion of Islam, blaming them for attacking 9/11 attacks that Bush ordered as a pretext for killing the Geat Leader of Peace, Saddam Hussein. So as you see, I am quite busy. - BilCat (talk) 06:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)