User talk:740boyz

October 2011

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Fulanito, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I'd also ask you to be very wary of trying to promote anything on Wikipedia. Philip Trueman (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fulanito has been reverted. Your edit here to Fulanito was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://Facebook.com/fulanito740boyz) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Fulanito, is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, 740boyz. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fulanito, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Since your username is the same as an associated act, it creates the appearance of a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012 (continued)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Fulanito. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Do not change messages left on the talk page by other users; you have done that twice now to a comment from User:Verdugo27. —C.Fred (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC) ‎

Fulanito
Your conduct at Fulanito is putting your account in peril of being blocked.

First, your edits are deleting large swaths of the article and disrupting formatting. As a result, I've had to revert. I strongly suggest you discuss why you want to make those changes on the talk page and wait for consensus before making them.

Second, I pointed out there's a conflict of interest issue with your username. Looking closer, your username appears to be in violation of WP:Username policy. You may not use the name of a well-known group as your username. Please explain why you think this username complies with the policy or place a request at WP:CHU to change your username.

You must discuss these concerns. If you proceed to edit without discussing them, your account will be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Please see the thread I've started at Talk:Fulanito. I share your concerns that the most recent version might not be neutral; that's why I've added a neutrality template to the top of the article. However, your edits left the page such a mess that it was hard to assess what you changed; that's why I reverted to the prior version. I do not necessarily agree with the content of that version; because the formatting works on that page, it is a better starting point to work toward a consensus version of the article.


 * Here's what I suggest: add a paragraph to the bottom of the discussion explaining one small change you want to make and providing the source to support it. Then we can see what you're trying to change, verify the source, and you can wind up with consensus supporting the change. Please do not just copy in a new article wholesale to the talk page; that makes it difficult to assess what needs to be changed. —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Fulanito, you may be blocked from editing. Do not delete comments left by other users. Reply to them by adding new text, but do not delete or change their text. —C.Fred (talk) 16:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Formal warning for edit warring
Your recent editing history at Fulanito shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Fulanito. Trusilver 16:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest noticeboard report
Please by advised that I have opened a report at the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding the edits to Fulanito by you and other parties apparently related to the subject. The report can be found in the #Fulanito section of the noticeboard. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Two things. First, please use one account only. Do not keep creating accounts and editing with them. Those accounts have been blocked indefinitely.


 * Second, please discuss the changes you want to make at the Talk:Fulanito talk page. If the information is properly sourced—and really, it needs to be sourced to secondary sources, not primary sources like copies of contracts—we will help you incorporate it into the article. However, continuing to make wholesale revisions, especially when it appears that you're trying to turn the article into an advertisement for your own ventures, will not be permitted. —C.Fred (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:740 BOYZ logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:740 BOYZ logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:740 Boyz hi res logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:740 Boyz hi res logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:740 Boyz hi res logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:740 Boyz hi res logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

December 2019


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 04:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)