User talk:75.108.94.227/twenty more questions for the candidates

questions for the arbcom candidates
Instructions.

q#X

 * Example question goes here. This is an example-question.  It is not an actual question, sorry.

q#A

 * Short form: I have a record of minimising drama.
 * Long form: I have a record of minimising drama in emotionally charged onwiki situations.

q#B

 * Short form: I favour strong over light sanctions.
 * Long form: I see myself as being on the tough side of the spectrum, favouring strong over light sanctions.

q#C

 * Short form: I'm prepared to manage difficult editors.
 * Long form: I’m prepared to manage difficult editors under the radar where privacy is imperative.

q#D

 * Short form: Drafting judgments in plain, simple language is my strength.
 * Long form: Drafting cases in plain, simple language will be one of my strengths as an arbitrator.

q#E

 * Short form: ArbCom's scope to manage excessive behaviour needs to be widened.
 * Long form: The current scope of ArbCom’s powers to manage excessive behaviour needs to be widened.

q#F

 * Short form: All case evidence should be on-wiki.
 * Long form: Case evidence should always be onwiki for the sake of transparency.

q#G

 * Short form: Arb discussions on cases should be on-wiki.
 * Long form: Discourse among arbitrators about a case should not be conducted behind closed doors.

q#H

 * Short form: Arb burnout is a major problem to address.
 * Long form: Arbitrator burnout is a major problem and the Committee should address it urgently.

q#I

 * Short form: Judgment pages: easy enough for community to get the messages.
 * Long form: ArbCom’s judgment pages are easy enough for community members to extract the important messages behind judgements.

q#J

 * Short form: Accept fewer cases, leave more for AN/I etc.
 * Long form: ArbCom should accept fewer cases and leave more to community forums such as AN/I.