User talk:75.131.46.38

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gog and Magog has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, see WP:NOTVAND. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gog and Magog. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gog and Magog was changed by 75.131.46.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865881 on 2016-04-09T03:50:01+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gog and Magog shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)