User talk:75.133.99.177

January 2022
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Siemens Charger. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Siemens Charger, you may be blocked from editing. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Siemens Charger. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Siemens Charger. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Repeatedly changing numbers to the version you prefer without providing any source is disruptive, and you have done this 4 times today, which is a violation of the 3 revert rule. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Siemens Charger
Stop changing the numbers on the article without providing any rationale for the change. You are edit warring, and if you continue to refuse to communicate, you will find yourself blocked again, for a longer time period. I am giving you one last chance to communicate before I seek action from an administrator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at BL20GH, you may be blocked from editing. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Brookville BL20GH. CodeTalker (talk) 05:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.