User talk:75.164.156.68

December 2020
Hello, I'm Twassman. I noticed that you recently removed content from Politics of the International Space Station without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 00:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Hi Twassman,


 * Apologies I thought I included a summery of my edit for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_the_International_Space_Station#China. The summery was that China is not a member of ISS and has not taken any formal action to participate in ISS. Several paragraph about China's own space station isn't relevant compared to the other countries that are participants or have expressed formal interest in ISS. Additionally this section is problematic as most of the sources in this section are bad links and missing PDFs.


 * 75.164.156.68 (talk) 08:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)skywind


 * I understand. However, it is generally frowned upon to remove large sections from articles without consensus. For large changes, it is often a good idea to ask on the talk page before editing. The rationale for including information on China is to explain how and why China is not a participant. — Twassman &#91;Talk·Contribs&#93; 16:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)