User talk:75.168.116.235

June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Men's rights movement, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Per WP:SYNTH, you cannot combine half-lines from multiple sources to arrive at a claim that no individual source supports as a whole.
 * You need a source that states that specifically the MRM or MRAs are concerned with laws that only define rape in terms of penetration.
 * You cannot take a source that says that some laws only define rape in terms of penetration, another source that says "MRAs are concerned about..." (something), and laws that say that some men are concerned about how laws define rape, and combine them to arrive at the claim that MRAs are concerned about laws that only define rape in terms of penetration.
 * Also, per WP:BRD, it's on you to achieve consensus on the talk page before restoring the material you tried to add. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Men's rights movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Note
--Neil N  talk to me 15:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)