User talk:75.2.9.78

Gregg Berhalter
Find a policy that requires its removal and its gone. Otherwise, any further removals will be marked as vandalism and treated appropriately. Alansohn 02:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Continue to insert it and it will be treated as vandalism. See the wikipedia page for consensus about adding information. You and your Sock puppet have no consensus for adding the material, thus it will not remain. If you choose to report it as vandalim that's fine, an administrator will see your obvious ploy and disregard it. Until a consensus is reached the information will not be included. 75.2.9.78 02:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You are free to add other quotes to provide context or balance. There is no sockpuppet involved and no policy that forbids this quote. You have been warned again. Alansohn 03:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Continue to insert it and it will be treated as vandalism. See the wikipedia page for consensus about adding information. You and your Sock puppet have no consensus for adding the material, thus it will not remain. If you choose to report it as vandalim that's fine, an administrator will see your obvious ploy and disregard it. Until a consensus is reached the information will not be included. 75.2.9.78 02:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * You have stubbornly refused to reach a consensus. It's your way or no way. You are free to add other quotes to provide context or balance. The quote provided is sourced, verifiable and meets all known Wikipedia standards. Find one it violates and it will be removed. It has been repeatedly modified in efforts to address your concerns but you have stubbornly refused to find a way to cooperate. Try to work together or you will be banned from Wikipedia. Alansohn 03:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Aside from the fact that you just tried to warn me twice for the same edit, i'll ignore that last warning as pure idiocy. You're the one that is going AGAINST CONSENSUS BUILDING, which is a guideline here at wikipedia that you seem to be unfamiliar with. Here is the page for you to educate yourself WP:Consensus. Now, if you'll read that you'd understand that a consensus is CENTRAL to editing at wikipedia, what we have here is your disagreement with the two IP editors (myself included) and a user who edits ONLY the gregg berhalter article and like...one other one, who i strongly suspect is a sock puppet of yours. YOU are the one vandalising the article. 75.2.9.78 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Find a way to include this quote and I am more than happy to work with you. That is consensus. Your stubborn rejection of working together has been noted several times previously and you are only making your situation worse. You are free to add other quotes to provide context or balance but you have repeatedly resisted this offer and other offers to modify the way the quote is presented. Find a way to work together or you will be banned for future removals of the text from the article. Alansohn 03:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Requests for comment for Gregg Berhalter
Given that it seems that we are unable to address this issue by reaching a compromise on our own, largely because you have offered no alternative other than deleting the quote, I have started a Requests for comment process on the talk page of Gregg Berhalter. Please try to present a neutral explanation of your reasons for removing this quote. Hopefully, the comments we receive from other Wikipedia users will provide a middle ground for inclusion of the quote that can satisfy both of us. Please review Requests for comment so that you are clear on the process. Alansohn 04:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)