User talk:75.72.162.232

Edits to Gackt
Hello. Your edits to Gackt have been removed again per violation of WP: WELLKNOWN which states that: ''In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out.''

Your edits are not well documented by multiple reliable sources. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. Please refrain from adding such materials.  on camera  10:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

It is relevant, and I provided two primary sources in the form of relevant Japanese news articles about it. My edits followed those rule just fine.

" Example:   A politician is alleged to have had an affair. It is denied, but multiple major newspapers publish the allegations, and there is a public scandal. The allegation belongs in the biography, citing those sources. However, it should state only that the politician was alleged to have had the affair, not that the affair actually occurred.

If the subject has denied such allegations, their denial(s) should also be reported"
 * The accusations need sources from multiple reliable sources, I'm not sure those Japanese articles are reliable news agencies. You need to find multiple sources from the top news agencies in Japan. It's important to treat biographies of living persons carefully and not include accusations that appear to be tabloid news.  on camera  19:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)