User talk:7543sgserg5hw544ygsgdfvs

May 2020
Hi PrestigousChimp! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at White genocide conspiracy theory that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * And many other articles. Best to never use it. Doug Weller  talk 10:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Looks like misrepresentation of sources at Roman Britain - block-worthy?
Here's an offer - you show how the sources backed "However, it is important to not overstate this 'diversity'. Over 95% of the population at any one time was 'indigenous', with migrants often only being temporary and in population centres, with historians criticising media-hype about diversity as a 'revisionist narrative to suit pro-migration arguments in the 21st century", name the historians and explain why they all said the same quote, and attribute the first part of your text at the article talk page, and I won't block you. If you can do that, I'll eat humble pie. If you can't, clearly block-worthy. Doug Weller talk 09:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 09:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)