User talk:76.110.243.230

July 2020
Hello, I'm Drmies. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to St. Augustine Monster have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ''Kindly don't editorialize in article space. '' Drmies (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Yet another jackoff. Any contribution that does not blindly support preexistent material is deemed unconstructive. How beyond pathetic, indeed, materially cowardly. No wonder the academic community consistently shits all over Wikipedia.

What you administrators have to offer would be better received were you not, to a man, positively obsessed by your respective would-be eccentricities.
 * I think I've seen you before, with your nonsensical comments about academia and this awful verbosity. Wikipedia's guidelines are really clear in regards to edits like yours: no editorializing, no original research (and certainly no poorly-written amateurish commentary). You see, we are in fact doing what we can to have at least some academic credibility. As for "jackoff": you want to bloviate about academic standing, and that's what you offer? Drmies (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   ''' The creeper2007Talk! ''' Be well, stay safe 18:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unsourced or poorly sourced editing
The material I added to the Clinton e-mail controversy articles was so many strata above the heads of any of your readers that you should be kissing my feet for my willingness to contribute it.

Of course, it took little time for some left-wing jackass frivolously to delete it.

Why do I waste any of my time trying to introduce any quality whatsoever into this garbage mill of a site?