User talk:76.112.108.138

May 2018
Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mark Callahan seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

You are completely biased and knowingly passing false information presenting it as truth.

On Monday, Legal action will be taken against all parties involved.

he changes are in accordance with Ottawa and Canadian Federal Anti-Defamation Law

Either prove your data is 100 percent accurate, which the data is out of date, or leave the data as presented.

A third party that is not the matter of the subject at hand wishes to have the data corrected to its factual form pursuant a settlement in which a non-disclosed third-party created this page with deliberately false and misleading information.

The Unnamed third party is willing to pursue any and all legal remedies to correct the lapse of judgment for deliberately creating the false information and retained a neutral party to correct this Wikipedia page to the corrected FACTUAL information as edited.

The continued passing of false information as presented by your edits will not stand up in court as the information is knowingly false and can be proven in court to be false. Further, continued edits violate the spirit of Wikipedia and an appeal to the helpdesk of Wikipedia will be asked as well as a filing for the unmasking of user data to obtain information needed to further pursue damages against all clients slandered by knowingly false information.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 76.112.108.138. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Mark Callahan ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--- Note ---

You are completely off base, devoid of factual data and written poorly with bias.
 * Please discuss your edits on the articles talk page as you have now been reverted by two editors. You can also ask for help at the teahouse or the help desk. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

talk page

Both Editors are completely bias and lacking factual data citing irrelevant and non-factual data as factual data.

The changes are in accordance with Ottowa and Canadian Federal Anti-Defamation Law

Either prove your data is 100 percent accurate, which the data is out of date, or leave the data as presented.

A third party that is not the matter of the subject at hand wishes to have the data corrected to its factual form pursuant a settlement in which a non-disclosed third-party created this page with deliberately false and misleading information.

The Unnamed third party is willing to pursue any and all legal remedies to correct the lapse of judgment for deliberately creating the false information and retained a neutral party to correct this Wikipedia page to the corrected FACTUAL information as edited.

The continued passing of false information as presented by your edits will not stand up in court as the information is knowingly false and can be proven in court to be false. Further, continued edits violate the spirit of Wikipedia and an appeal to the helpdesk of Wikipedia will be asked as well as a filing for the unmasking of user data to obtain information needed to further pursue damages against all clients slandered by knowingly false information.

Final warning + good advice that you will probably ignore
Here's the warning:

Your recent editing history at Mark Callahan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Now, here's the advice:

What everyone is criticizing here is your behavior. It has very little to do with the article content. There's an effectual way to get the article content changed: use its talk page. What you are doing is not effectual, not helpful to the encyclopedia, not helpful to Mark Callahan, and not in your own self-interest. Please try doing something different. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 05:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 05:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Neil N  talk to me 05:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

If you return to editing after this block expires you will be re-blocked as long as your legal threat goes unretracted. --Neil N  talk to me 05:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)