User talk:76.117.247.55/Archive 4

rfa
 False Prophet would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact False Prohet to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. Wikipedia's  False Prophet   holla at me   Improve Me 16:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

To start it would to be as you are now. But if it were to be dismissed, it could be switched. I just think you are a great editor that should have the respect of a registered editor of your status. Wikipedia's  False Prophet   holla at me   Improve Me 02:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

dismissed as in treated as a joke and deleted. Wikipedia's  False Prophet   holla at me   Improve Me 02:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Just FYI an IP address can not be sysop'd, both at a policy and a technical level. Prodego  talk  22:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I figured you must know, this was mainly for False Prophet's info. The way users are given admin rights (see if interested) means an account is required. It is possible to pseudo-sysop IPs by giving all IPs the same rights as admins though. You really should create...  Prodego  talk  22:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * That may take a while ;-) Prodego  talk  22:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Cold Fusion spammer
Thanks for redirecting my report- I wasn't sure where to post that. Hopefully some bans will at least slow the spammer down... --Noren 18:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I am an Evil Vandal
Please block me indefinitely or until the sun blows up, which ever one happens first, I make legal threats, personal attacks, insert penis pictures into articles, make zillions of sockpuppets, remove legitimate warnings from my talk page, TROLL, move pages to "X ON WHEELS!!!", think Wikipedia is Communism, live in North Carolina, am named "Johnny", try to impersonate and harass Hephaestos, am butt buddies with Bobby Boulders, sexually harrass female admins that I have no chance with, rape children, shoot cops, and hate GOD. 205.188.116.130 04:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * You forgot "Primetime" and "Lightbringer". 68.39.174.238 20:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit count
I was just curious about what numbers you've racked up as an anonymous contributor so I put you through User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js and here's what came out.

Username 68.39.174.238 Total edits 14606 Distinct pages edited 8855 Average edits/page 1.649 First edit 11:21, 26 September 2005 (main) 8603 Talk 685 User 623 User talk 2233 Image 367 Image talk 38 MediaWiki talk 6 Template 412 Template talk 42 Help 2 Category 14 Wikipedia 1388 Wikipedia talk 139 Portal 51 Portal talk 3

Most impressive indeed! It's nearly 3 times more than my count. = ) Once again I salute you. Cheers --  Netsnipe  ►  13:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Woah! Simply south 22:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * More than I can do. AppleMacReporter 01:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

*cough*
This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving. // Pilotguy  ( Have your say ) 01:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If you need someone to touch your archive page due to the restriction on new pages, just say the word. Thanks for all your edits! -- nae'blis 21:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Hoaxery
They do look a bit suspicious, but Metal Archives confirms that Tundra and Frostmoon  exist. I can't really say much about Domen, but it comes up on Google and the author seems to be in good faith so I assume it's real. Thanks for your comments. Prolog 04:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

SVg
I will convert it to SVg while I'm at it, though I wish you would have told me on my talk page, I stumbled apon it by chance. Why is it that you do not have a main page? Do you value your anominimity to let your identity be only known as a string of numbers? Dfrg.m s c 1. 2 . 3 09:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Right. So I set about trying to convert it to SVG, by opening it with Macromedia fireworks and Paint Shop Pro respectively and trying to save as file type SVG - to no avail, SVG is not even listed in the dropdown save-as menu on either. What to do then, do I need to re-create the Image(s)? Thanks, Dfrg.m s c 1 . 2 . 3 23:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

BJAODN
Regarding this, a friend who found it hilarious posted at BJAODN with my permission. Right after it was posted, however, the user who wrote it originally vandalized it (at BJAODN) to make it seem more sympathetic to his/her position, and it remained that way until I fixed it just now. I think that's why it seemed a bit harsh. Thanks for the head's up. &middot; j e r s y k o   talk  &middot; 16:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:EUTooManyStars.jpg source
Please verify the source for Image:EUTooManyStars.jpg - I got a notice on my talk page that it would be deleted for lack of source, so I put that it was made by you. If this is not the case, can you show where you got it? Cheers! bd2412 T 21:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
 * The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
 * The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
 * The ability to start new pages.
 * The ability to rename pages.
 * The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
 * The ability to upload images.
 * The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
 * Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which will let others know who left it. &rArr; Bayerischermann     -  00:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during September 25 2006 (UTC) to Television
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 01:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting my userpage. DVD+ R/W 01:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Prod of BSA dishonesty
In the future, please use reason instead of. This assigns the date to the article, and ensures that the article is dealt with in a timely way. --Roninbk t c # 23:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Long term abuse/Universe Daily
Now who up and protected this page about 16 days after the last vandalization?! Now that's annoying! 68.39.174.238 13:29, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * G'Day Mr. 68. If you're tracking this guy as well, I'd be more than glad to unblock the LTA report just for you. --  Netsnipe  ►  08:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Protected pages are noxious, and that page has some formatting issues. However the protected prevents me yayaya (Old hat since you asked me about it 1st). There are an infuriating number of such subpages that are protected unendingly because of people who can't tell, or just don't care. EG. Roitr and Bonaparte. Anyway yes I want to be able to edit that page ;D! 68.39.174.238 02:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I've unprotected that page for your convenience. Cheers. --  Netsnipe  ►  18:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Who the Primetime expert is
If you want a real Primetime expert, talk to Connel MacKenzie over at Wiktionary wikt:User talk:Connel MacKenzie, where he is probably one of the best administrator there. He first brought notice of this plagiarist's activities here after fighting him over at Wiktionary. I just mostly catalog other user's work in fighting vandalism here, though I will report and clean up vandalism myself when I spot it. I also report vandals spotted by others when their reports are not put in the right place, like Administrator intervention against vandalism. The only two times I have tangled with this vandal is when someone reported one of his socks at Administrators' noticeboard and when I spotted a confession. My work on Long term abuse/Primetime was mostly to tidy up the page and to add missing information, like his Jimbo Wales ban and an infobox. Jesse Viviano 05:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Anti-Colonel Sanders
Where else are you supposed to list a massive Wikinews vandal? Wikinews does not have a long term abuse page.--B&amp;W Anime Fan 18:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

That archive thing
..Hope your not off the charts mad :-), but your talk page was just way too long. I couldn't help myself. If you really want to revert me, go ahead. -  Mike   | trick or treat   03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The one I use now is the one you see. I'll change it back after Halloween, although with all of the complaints that I'm getting, I might have to do it sooner ;-) -  Mike   | trick or treat   03:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha, yeah, I usually just go with this - Mike - but I figured I'd spice things up a little. I'll probably go back to something similar after Halloween, though I'll probably add a talk link in it.

Question
Would you object to having your userpage automatically redirect here? I really wouldn't call that a userpage, just convenience. *Chaos ensues* :-) -  Mike   | trick or treat   03:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha, I'll take that as a no. -  Mike   | trick or treat   03:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * One last scary thought that you've probably been bothered about a million times. What if your IP changes? -  Mike   | trick or treat   03:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * He must have bought a static IP from his ISP ... --⁪froth T C  05:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your recent Long term abuse query
Please email me in private at alau.wiki at Gmail com. I'm exercising WP:DENY since I know exactly who was responsible. --  Netsnipe  ►  10:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Posting as an anon in case of Wikistalking. The Anti-Colonel Sanders vandal is B&W Anime Fan (talk • contribs • [ page moves ] • block user • [ block log ]) . At the moment he's indefinitely blocked for sockpuppet vandalism with, and he's emailed me stating that "I will not ever vandalize again if you unblock me, but if you don't I WILL become the next WoW. All you have to do is unblock me. Think about. I would love to help the encyclopedia." We were fortunate enough that he emailed us using his ISP address, so I'm still balancing the prospect of either being able to manage/track this kid through his semi-legitimate, but still disruptive account or report him to his ISP or threatening to do so if we detect him again. In his email he also claims to have a dynamic IP address, so I'm not sure how much resources I want to throw into chasing after him/her. Please keep all replies here for the time being until I've figured out how to deal with B&W Anime Fan and co. with other administrators familiar with his case. Thanks --   Netsnipe  ►  as 129.94.6.28 10:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Check your talk page history for the reply... 68.39.174.238 10:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

???
You posted on my talk page. Was it meant for another user? I can't make sense of it. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 14:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

:(
"Suggestion" won't work under WP:U (see archive). Simply south 16:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

The "debate" over using your IP adress as a username. Simply south 20:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Is that really necessary?
I appreciate that he doesn't need to be listed on LTA anymore (Since that was just notorious trolling), but do you have to remove every possibly reference to that vandal? 68.39.174.238 20:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm just starving B&W Anime Fan of the attention he craves. I'm a practitioner of Deny recognition so unless someone's modus operandi is much more sinister than just serial defacement (which anyone can recognise at a glance), I don't believe that they belong on WP:LTA. --  Netsnipe  ►  20:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Argh, get a friggin username already.
Hi,

I haven't seen you on Wiktionary in a while, so I forgot your numeric IP when I rolled back your changes to WP:'T. I haven't checked all of your edits there yet, but the one that triggered my rollback was your removal of Rickyboy as a sock.

Perhaps you could discuss it with WillBeBack before removing that (or any others) again.

(I wish I knew what I did with that javascriptlet that applied your username to you. I never should have deleted it.)

--Connel MacKenzie - wikt 01:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Raritan Computer
Your speedy-spam tag on Raritan Computer was removed by another editor because the article has already survived an AfD. Please see Articles for deletion/Raritan Computer. The article can still probably be improved, though. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AAA! 03:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

"Deregulation of the Texas Electricity Market"
Sorry, my mistake... --AAA! 03:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Light tube
Hi anonymous user, I saw your last edits and reverted them here. I guess you had deleted the links because someone was trying to advertise for products (see definition of what´s spam under Spam). I have no advertising interest at all: I inserted them there because I think that if there are only few manufacturers, then this is relevant to the topic. If I´m wrong about this, please tell me, but please also giving a precise reference to which criterion on Wikipedia:Spam would be infringed. The links really look okay to me. Cheers, --Chris Howard 22:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, I´ve answered to (so far, the second part of) your comment here on my discussion page, thanks and best regards, --Chris Howard 11:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, same place... :) --Chris Howard 22:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

I never got around...
... to say thanks for this. That's one big flower, and one warm & fuzzy feeling. I appreciate it, but as always, did not find a moment to say thanks. Renata 11:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

welcoming...
I don't recall giving that one...and generally ONLY give them now to ppl who have contributed positively, at least once. My bad, I guess. Kukini 07:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

edit count /edit summary usage
How did you get those tools on the top of your user talk page? I want them on mine as well. Best, Kukini 07:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Kukini 02:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

User:68.39.174.238/Newgatery
I moved it from user talk to your userspace - hopefully this is a bit better. Anything you want created in userspace, I'll make for you! --SunStar Net 23:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Still don't want a userpage? If you add  I'm sure any number of folks would be happy to delete it for you (or just respond to this message). -- Rick Block (talk) 01:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Speaking of that page, I want to tell you that made a post today claiming to be behind both WoW (original) and WiC. I think you should probably examine this info and, if necessary, incorporate it into the Newgatery page. Scobell302 02:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * At this point, I'm not sure what additional changes, if any, should be made; however, I will continue to notify you of any new developments regarding these vandals (albeit infrequently). Scobell302 02:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

BTW
I strongly suspect that (aka, , ) is the Juche vandal on the Korean Wikipedia. Shultz (and his IP) has been known to create redirects of "Kim Il Sung city" to "Seoul" and "Roh Moo Hyun city" to "Pyongyang" across several different Wikis (en, ko, ru to name a few), and one major theme of the Juche vandal was to redirect "Seoul" to "Kim Il Sung City", "Busan" to "Kim Jong Il City", and (less frequently) "Pyongyang" to "Roh Moo Hyun City". In addition, Shultz's IP has made a substantial amount of edits on the Korean Wikipedia related to the WiC template and marking socks. Finally, the Juche vandal announced its retirement on September 11, the same day as Shultz (as Shultz IV)'s last known edit. For more information, please check the contributions for the accounts listed above, as well as the contribs/talk pages of 68.102.193.78 on the Korean and Russian Wikipedias (possible other Wikis as well). (Please note that I'm about to sign off for tonight, so you don't need to respond on my talk page.) Scobell302 03:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The Juche vandal's last edit was from the account ko:사용자:Last message from... to the page ko:사용자토론:On this day, 9-11, WiJ hereby retires. Goodbye! (the message is still visible today). Another think that makes me think that Shultz is the Juche vandal is that the Juche vandal appears to be a native English speaker with some basic knowledge of Korean, which is exactly how Shultz describes himself in his userbox gallery. If you'd like to examine the Juche vandal's edits in more detail, this page lists the vast majority of the accounts he has used. Scobell302 04:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Your message
Question and reply copied here from my talk page:

"In this edit, isn't 4 still a majority of 6, or is there some supermajority requirement for closing a case? 68.39.174.238 19:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Two separate issues here. First, there are 8 active arbitrators so 5 is the majority. (6 are away). Second, the cases always take 4 net votes to close. (Support minus the oppose votes). Does this explain? FloNight 19:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)"

Thank you
Just a quick note to thank you for de-SPAMMING Validation (drug manufacture). It has been on my watchlist for sometime, as I have been awaiting a new growth of thick skin. --DO11.10 02:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Nah, I don't have a problem with that stuff, that editor was clearly misguided. The skin thinning happened in Flow cytometry, which made me rethink attempting to remove spam from most articles. I still have my favorite (sigh) link spammers, whom I revert on a regular basis, but I have generally shied away from the spam "issues".--DO11.10 04:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

User:CoolKatt number 99999's userpage
Hi 68!

Thanks for your many contributions to Wikipedia. Is there a reason you keep adding banned-user templates to CoolKatt's userpage? This user, as far as I can tell, has not been banned, and may return after his block expires. He may not edit US TV station articles, but may edit other articles. Adding a banned user template to a user who is not permabanned is a bad idea, per the policy at WP:BAN: ''Wikipedia's hope for banned users is that they will leave Wikipedia with their pride and dignity intact, whether permanently or for the duration of their ban. As such, it is inappropriate to bait banned users or take advantage of their ban to mock them.'' While your edit may have not been intended to mock this user, adding a banned user template for a user who has not been banned from editing will only add fuel to the fire, and will not allow this user to make a dignified exit. Firsfron of Ronchester 22:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification, and the correction, 68. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester  00:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Newgatery
Wow your Newgatery subpage is great. I recently had a run-in with an unusual vandal that created several random pages, and replaced a talk page and subsequently my user page and talk page, with the Denver International Airport article. The block log refers to them as "the airport vandal". Do you know anything about this vandal? Might it be an appropriate addition to your wall of shame? I certainly consider them unusual but I'm not sure if they're notable :) Dylan Lake (t·c· ε ) 00:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: "About the sockpuppetry you've been investigating"
First of all, I must admit my initial "anon-biggotry." I feel ashamed. :) You have a longer history here then I do.

I appreciate your offer... I think RFCU would reject my request since there is no community/arbcom ban and there hasn't been any "votestacking". If you can help me start a Puppet case that would be great. ---J.S (t|c) 23:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The only category he might qualify for is "C. Ongoing, serious pattern vandalism". I'll apply under that and see what happens.  He's never been under "remedies issued by the arbitration committee" or "community-based bans or blocks".  *shrug* I'll create the request... the worst that can happen is a "no". :) ---J.S (t|c) 04:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Community blocks, as I understand it, refer to the indefinite blocking of a user based on consensus. I've seen a number of notes on WP:AN to that effect. ---J.S (t|c) 04:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Case started: Requests for checkuser/Case/Grazon ---J.S (t|c) 04:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Puppetry Confirmed. Now what? ---J.S (t|c) 17:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Posted on WP:ANI already. No responce yet. I'll give it till monday then I'll... ummm no idea. lol ---J.S (t|c) 22:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Phew... thats a load off. ---J.S (t|c) 18:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

History of the United States Constitution
Several months ago you inserted a template indicating a tonal problem with the article, but never explained what the problem was. Could you leave a comment on its talk page explaining your complaint so that it can be corrected? -- VGF11 00:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Richardbooth
Actually, it looks like most of the articles/edits by this user are legit, although the notability of at least one, Clement John Tranter is questionable at best. I get the idea someone may have Wikijacked his user account, maybe he saved his password and his kid is playing with his 'pooter when he ain't around. Just a WAG. Tubezone 20:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

YouTube boilerplate
I like the changes... but we've shifted gears to just removing the links. (Shooting first, asking questions latter... :)) Most of the articles we run across don't really have active editing going on. ---J.S (t|c) 07:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Username Barnstar
I wish there was a username barnstar... 68.39.174.238 17:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merci beaucoup. I created the name “House of Scandal” in 1995 while organizing and publicizing a charity event in Boston’s South End.  The name was inspired by the film Paris is Burning and I have used it ever since. -- House of Scandal 03:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: well-written stuff
I forgot already. =( It had something to do with Esperanza, an organization that I am a member of. Perhaps you commented just recently during an MfD against Esperanza or during the Overhaul.-- E d  ¿Cómo estás? 03:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I wish =(. You know, you're one of the anons I've seen around here that are actually excellent editors! Keep up the good work!.-- E d  ¿Cómo estás? 03:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I see.
Well then, it would appear my joke has failed. Thanks for the info. Wavy G 02:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

49 PARA
As far as the copyvio on this article is concerned, I have no way of knowing whether the content was used without permission or not. Either way, I am glad that we are rid of it. Thanks. ---Charles 04:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sounds like, was it Hamilton?,: "Bad laws cannot be obeyed or enforced, only repealed" ? 68.39.174.238 02:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

rutabaga and badger muffaletta
yes, that's right. User:Pedant 02:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Yes I'd spotted 83.146.0.146 isn't 68.39.174 and I also agree with the clean-up flags etc although it is always nice to have help as well as flags...best wishes --BozMo talk 07:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hmm. Neither comment was trolling. I had a quick look at your IP record and put you down as on the side of the angels, on top of which you were making valid points (and I had just copied the page over from wikipedia: and still haven't changed the style properly. The other IP was pretty eratic in behaviour and we may never see back. --BozMo talk 09:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Public Domain Images
BTW I think you need to move your new site listings to Public_domain_image_resources rather than the Public Domain talk pages --BozMo talk 11:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

And now for the real reason...
Would you mind deleting the revision of my talk page that you reverted? It was loaded with personal infos and while I may not like the uzers mentioned, I don't think that level of "4th wall breaking" is justified by anything I've seen them do. 68.39.174.238 02:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanx dude. 68.39.174.238 06:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem. You now have 1,137 new messages; just 200 more to go.  :)  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Are you going to be actively watching? I can't tell via deletion etc how many edits there are. 68.39.174.238 06:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC) PS. I'm willing to bet by the time I DO get 200 more there'll be an applicable barnstar ;D!


 * Uncyclopedia has a 1337 barnstar although it isn't all that aesthetically appealling. ;-) Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Sword of Christ
It appears to be a database glitch. I get a message he is blocked when I try to block him, it's just not showing properly. (see User_talk:HighInBC/Archive_14). - Mgm|(talk) 09:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

wpcd
The article text was written when the article was in its present location but the page history was lost when it was moved and the incorrectly move-reverted. Some more article history but not all is on the corresponding Wikipedia space page. That make sense? --BozMo talk 06:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Some more of the edit history is buried in the middle of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia-CD/Download&action=history btw.


 * Incidentally your comment on the AfD on the current version article (which I have tried to cite a bit more etc) would be appreciated. You are obviously a pretty clued up editor and I'd respect your opinion even if you decide on balance we ought to put it back in Wikipedia space. I still think its a weak keep, but obviously other people have legit other views. --BozMo talk 12:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

New Section
New Section —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.156.81.187 (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

Demand that You Cease and Desist

 * The following "discussion" is an archived post of the attempted trolling and ban evasion by the author/user below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as right below it).  No further edits should be made to this archive.  

The result was blatant trollery and ban evasion by a notorious vandal — Username blocked and IP going to be blocked as a long undiscovered/unused open proxy 68.39.174.238 06:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

In this posting, you admitted that you have been harassing me to make me upset. You have been systematically going to all wikis where I have edited and posted notices about me in order to get me blocked. These include the Spanish Wikipedia, Commons, Meta, and Wiktionary.,,, , , &c You have also badgered administrators on those wikis into locking my user pages so that you can leave nasty, pointless notices about what happened to me on Wikipedia, seven months after I was banned here. You also badger administrators by repeated postings into deleting my contributions. You know that I do not like being called a vandal and that I do not believe that my ban was justified. You write such notices with smiley faces, jesting exclamation marks, and exclamations like yay!, as if you're having a lot of fun and as if you think that bullying me is funny., [|undefined

I demand that you cease this behavior immediately. I am considering starting a request for comment about this. I can tell that you are in your teens, but you can not be so stupid as to not know what bullying is. I also realize that I am banned, but that does not mean that you can act this way towards me. I am not a vandal. I never hurt anyone. The only thing I ever did was insult you four months ago. I also made some copyright violations seven months ago. I am not Willy on Wheels or Johnny the Vandal. I tried to help Wikipedia, and I think that you actually are hurting it.--Temp22 04:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If you are banned (as you claim to be), then you shouldn't be editing anywhere on Wikipedia. This is sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK).-- E d  ¿Cómo estás? 04:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * WHAT IS YOUR POINT?? His behavior needs to stop NOW and editing using a "sockpuppet" is far less serious than his behavior. (Note though I didn't really pretend to be anyone else.) If he doesn't guarantee that he will stop, then I will start an RFC.--220.73.47.9 05:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * To anyone who sees this later, you may wish to read WP:'T for the background on who the above is. 68.39.174.238 05:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * That page is completely irrelevant. I haven't seen any proof of "Criminal external harassment," either, and that page was written six months ago. No one has attempted to defend your behavior, which is fine, because it is indefensible.--220.73.47.9 05:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Primetime, at this point the best way you can help Wikimedia is to stop editing its projects. Your copyright violations did not end when you were banned here - you've added more copied material here and to other projects. It's pointless, as they will all be removed sooner or later. It wastes your time and the time of other editors. If you don't want editors and admins hassling you then just stop hanging around where you aren't welcome. -Will Beback · † · 06:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * ''The above "discussion" is preserved as as evidense of the breach. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as right below this). No further edits should be made to this archive.

Re: User:Primetime
Thanx for whacking Primetime's latest round of sockpuppetry and trolling. Can I ask for some help? He's trying to save his reputation by attacking me on Commons. See commons:User:HQCentral and commons:User:Temp. Thanx for whatever happens. 68.39.174.238 07:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Contact anyone on the Administrators list. --  Netsnipe  ►  07:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Primetime
Wow, thanks! I never heard of Primetime. Naturally, I filed an RFCU as I would have done to another user I'm watching. (see Cute 1 4 u). However, when I saw WP:'T, I was appalled by the blatant violations this user has committed! Academic honesty is enforced in all high schools and universities, and that user should know better!-- E d  ¿Cómo estás? 04:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

That Fisherman vandal dude
Hi! Thanks for the Speedy tags on those two nonsense articles by, who also twice added nonsense to Back to the Future about time travel by head trauma. The first time for that vandal edit was as on 12/11. I didn't quite know what to do other than put a test4 on the new name and (after some research) a hoax tag on the new articles. Speedy? Suspected Sock? I haven't done either of those templates to date, so I was nervous about trying that. Thank you for rushing in where I feared to tread! I'll have to memorize your IP now. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 08:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Lcarsdata 20:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Please Use Edit Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Lcarsdata 20:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Just a note, I now understand your re-reversion, thanks for your explanation. Lcarsdata 20:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Lcarsdata 20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Coatofarms
Hi - I think this has happened in a lot of cases, and I'm going to (hopefully) have Carnildo run Orphanbot on all the untagged images to see which have no licence (as the licence on a coat of arms is dubious at the best of times). Thanks, M a rtinp23 23:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hehe :) M a rtinp23 23:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

 * Now that's rather droll... "LOL"! 68.39.174.238 21:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

User:68.39.174.238/Newgatery
Would you mind if this were deleted? Have you seen WP:DENY? User:Zoe|(talk) 23:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I understand your reasoning, but how do you reconcile it with DENY? User:Zoe|(talk) 00:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'm not too sure how I feel about DENY myself, so I'm not going to do anything about it, but don't be surprised if somebody doesn't list it for MfD some day. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 00:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance:
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Template messages/Maintenance (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as using a shared IP address to edit a page that experiences malicious edits by users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges or open proxies. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of server or shared IP ranges and new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Warning removed
 * If you see a copyright violation, feel free to report it on Copyright problems. You may also change the text yourself to avoid the violation, rather than removing it entirely. Such balant text removal is often seen as vandalism.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   12:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Suggestion: use more edit summaries, 68.39.174.238. If you had, this could have headed off this entire situation. "Rem copyvio" would have done it. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

anti-spam on the Swahili wikipedia
Thanks for your suggestions about security on the Swahili wikipedia. Could you please get in contact with the sysop for the site, http://sw.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Matt_Crypto, since he is the person who would need to implement? Thanks, Malangali 22:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Increase
Please see Talk:Increase_Mather. --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 02:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

WP CD
Hi there. Any chance you could make some specific requests on remaining changes to 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection to get the clean up tag removed? I have had a go but am a bit blind to it now. --BozMo talk 09:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

**
it just seems like the article has been copied from some Fans website and pasted here, which is against the copyrights conditions , review the edits History to make sure it haven't been copied and pasted and then remove the template from the article , and thanks for co-operation :) , such singers and actors articles usually been copied from somewhere , sorry friend :) Ammar 03:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Steve Mazur
Hiya. :) I can completely understand why you'd think all that information was copied and pasted from somewhere, but it was actually all information I got by digging around, asking friends, asking Steve himself (or being around when Steve was asked certain things), etc. Back when Steve was still pretty new to OLP, I was going to make a fansite for him, but didn't end up doing it... so that's why I went and gathered together a lot of that info (just in case you were wondering haha). Sadly, I can't really cite my sources, because it's impossible to cite a conversation you had with a person in real life.--Nikki4982 06:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. -- // &gt;|&lt; Shablog 23:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Microfluidics:
Your recent edit to Microfluidics (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Iceland (supermarket) help
Thanks for your help with this copyright violation & tips for the future. Tafkam 11:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Userbox
The userboxes came from the Wikipedia Apple (or was it Macintosh ... one of the two) and Windows pages, and I'm pretty sure they didn't have a fair use on them, meaning that they couldn't be copyright boxes - I think, however if you would kindly direct me to a simmilar microsoft/mac userbox I'd gladly change. Danielfolsom 13:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Question
Can you clarify the reason for deleting Image:Erdferkel-drawing.jp]? I wasn't sure what exactly the problem was, and since it's linked to an article, I didn't want to delete it just yet. Let me knoq. See, Pilotguy can remain anonymous too. --66.56.158.36 20:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Your (Amazing) Edit Count
Hey 68.39.174.238! Thought I'd let you have the latest updates. However, don't let this let you have editcountitis! SD31415  (SIGN HERE)  22:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow, you've got a lot! Simply south 23:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wong Shun Leung
Nope, it's not the same or comparable to the deleted version. The deleted version was three paragraphs long and did not assert the nobility of the article in any meaningful way. -→ Buchanan-Hermit™ / ?! 00:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Newgatery page update
Please note that has recently added information on the North Carolina Vandal and Bobby Boulders into your Newgatery page. I'm not sure whether you were ready to document these vandals, but if you are, feel free to expand/modify his writing; if not, you can delete those sections and drop Canderous a note about this. Scob e ll302 08:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I love you
Thank you for remaining anonymous and showing those irritating template-posters that anonymous IP does not automatically equal vandal. I have been searching for someone like you for ages.

Then again, since you gained notoriety as a vandal-fighter and would therefore be an admin by now if you had an account, I don't know if you're actually a tosser. But for now, I love you. --90.240.34.177 01:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * British expression. Equates to 'jerk'. --90.240.34.177 14:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

That was a tremendously good question...
I took a look at the page, and I think that while it's a good idea, what we have is a source problem, not a spam problem. Even if we account for socks being multiple users, we're not going to get any more than maybe 10 articles it shows up in. Furthermore, there has to be rationale for blocking, and it can always be unblocked later. However, it gives me an interesting idea, which I will have to think on a bit. MSJapan 17:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * As they are amenable, it seems, I added it as a request. MSJapan 22:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Purging the cache
Hi! Thanks for giving the PNG crusade bot a star. I'm glad to know someone appreciates my work!

I noticed that you recently made an edit to your userpage with the comment "Added text to force update". Did you know that you can force an update to the page just by adding  to the end of the URI? Take a look at Purge, it might be helpful to you in the future. &mdash;Remember the dot (t) 04:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

That rarely works, especially when Primetime decides to perpetrate some malicious page moves. 68.39.174.238 14:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah, okay. &mdash;Remember the dot (t) 00:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and thanks for the info about Primetime. I didn't know that anyone took vandalism to such an extreme. &mdash;Remember the dot (t) 00:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Heh
Yeah, it's a shweet name. I'll make me sig more interesting, hang on a tick... -- Wikify me, captain!  05:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

There we go! Thanks for the award, by the way. ;) -- Captain Wikify Argh! 05:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Humor
Check this out:. Apparently the guy reads the image talk page and thinks I'm Jimbo Wales. -Will Beback · † · 01:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Indeed, that's why I posted a Google cache link rather than a straight URL. -Will Beback · † · 22:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

...
I'm sorry, what? The Fish 19:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Possibly related IPs
Are any of the following IPs related (or even identical) to you?



Scob e ll302 12:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Electricity meter
Hey, i noticed you changed many parts of the Electricity Meter article, and I reverted them. I see you are not a vandal, let me know if you would like them reverted. DUBJAY04 00:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

That's a big one! (flower, that is)
Thanks for the kind note about hoax-fighting. I like the humor in Kevanbd's hoaxes, and I just wish he devoted his writing skills to fact instead of fiction. He's capable of genuine contributions, but the UBS hoaxes did get a little tedious after a while. Thanks again! Casey Abell 18:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I was going to wait a few days to see if Kevanbd had anything to say, then prod the articles. But if you want to AfD them, I have no objections. I've reviewed Kevanbd's contribs list, and I don't think there are any more hoaxes. But you might want to check yourself. Thanks again for the kind note. Casey Abell 22:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I've now prodded the four articles and warned Kevanbd. I believe this will eliminate all his hoaxes. Casey Abell 15:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Spam blocklist
I guess that was a very good suggestion, then, given the current circumstances. Thanks for keeping up with it, too. MSJapan 20:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)