User talk:76.190.144.181

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Basilica of St Denis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Basilica of St Denis was changed by 76.190.144.181 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954912 on 2018-04-09T14:32:37+00:00.

May 2018
The recent edit you made to Frankie Grande constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize Wikipedia pages. Thank you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to South Korea in the Vietnam War seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Your recent editing history at Gertrude the Great shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
Hello, I'm Person who formerly started with "216". I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grievances of the United States Declaration of Independence have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Person who formerly started with &#34;216&#34; (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grievances of the United States Declaration of Independence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Person who formerly started with &#34;216&#34; (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.