User talk:76.26.239.100

November 2016
Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Party's Over (1956 song), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Fishing techniques, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Awsomaw. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Consubstantiation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '' Hi, Please use the article's WP:talk page to discuss major changes to an article. You also might be looking for Real_presence_of_Christ_in_the_Eucharist for Spiritual presence in the supper.'' Awsomaw (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wawa (company). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bmf 051 (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 01:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, I'm EDG 543. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Leadoff hitter seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Response
Hello. I responded to your message on my talk page. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 12:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Tubby23. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Glossary of golf have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Tubby23  talk  23:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to James S. C. Chao have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: James S. C. Chao was changed by 76.26.239.100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856057 on 2021-03-05T01:53:26+00:00

June 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Mike Austin (golfer). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)