User talk:76.28.27.28

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alchemy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:59, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Caper, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at They, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I did no such thing, wikipedia seeks to keep the masses from knowing the TRUTH

CAPERS DO NOT WORK WITH THE FRUIT PIE!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.27.28 (talk • contribs)


 * Your actions on this site are recorded here. There is no point in lying about it.  As for accusations of censorship, Wikipedia does not exist to push your personal opinion about what works in fruit pie.  That is an opinion, and to force your's as fact would oppress the views of others.  Ian.thomson (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

And to counter your retort, it is your own opinion that the general population of the world does not wish to know what is in fruit pies. FRUIT PIES ARE DELICIOUS! and everyone should be informed as to what goes well and does not go well with said fruit filled pastry. You sir a hack, and I care not for your personal agenda. I care only of the facts, and you sir are denying the truth that Capers do not belong in fruit pies, so go ahead, next time you eat a fruit pie, eat it with capers, and then you will confirm my so called "opinion"! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.27.28 (talk • contribs)

This is your last warning; the next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I understand and respect your opinion, however, I find that I myself am being personally attacked by you, and if it continues I will report you to a senior member of the Wikipedia Administration. So please kindly cease harassing me, or I will take legal action. Do not take your anger out on myself, a regular wikipedia user, because no one cares about what you have to say =]
 * No, you're clearly a vandal/troll, I'm just just waiting for you to do something unobjectionably ban worthy. If you were a regular user, you'd know that:
 * deliberately inserting errors into an article is unconstructive
 * Our neutral point of view policies limit personal opinion being inserted into an article
 * We don't take assinine commentary in articles
 * Not to make personal attacks (and what constitutes a personal attack)
 * and that making legal threats are against site policy
 * So go on, bring in the admins, you're sitting right on the edge of me bringing them in. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; I enjoy this site too regularly to do anything to constitute ban worthy, so your lucky =]

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Bluefist. Wikipedia is an all-volunteer operation and I am one of the many volunteers here who watch for unconstructive edits. Everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Caper with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive. I have reverted it and ask that in the future you please use the sandbox for test edits, not encyclopedia articles. For constructive edits, always provide an informative edit summary so that other editors like me have a brief description of your intentions. If you have questions about editing Wikipedia, you might want to take a look at this tutorial. Also, feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. Bluefist  talk 23:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your fair and respectful approach, its was quite pleasant! But dude, have you ever tried capers with fruit pies? Its gross, and the people should be informed!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caper. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Caper was changed by 76.28.27.28 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901091 on 2011-07-21T04:39:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hanukkah, you may be blocked from editing. --   Luke    Talk 04:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; Let me do whatever the hell I want!

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dictatorship, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --   Luke    Talk 04:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 Hours for Repeated Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 04:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to British America, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: British America was changed by 76.28.27.28 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.990197 on 2011-09-09T03:31:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:31, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Fuck you you fucking fuck you. Communist Robots and Shit, I demand to speak to a real person! You know... one with feelings, and intestines, and whatnot.