User talk:76.68.59.180

August 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mathew Knowles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. InvadingInvader (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mathew Knowles. InvadingInvader (talk) 00:57, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mathew Knowles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.you're continuing the edit war you started a week ago, i suggest you go to the talk page and request edits instead of adding the blatant puffery sourced to knowles himself. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the confusion. I didn't even realize I was engaged in an edit war. I added citations this time because I thought that's why the changes were being reverted, I wasn't trying to ruffle any feathers.
 * I'm happy to follow the proper procedures as nothing I'm adding is inaccurate and the page itself is incredibly out of date. The Music World label no longer works with country or children's music, for example. Could you help guide me a little? I need to go to a talk page and request the changes be made rather than make the edits? Thanks for pointing out that I was doing something wrong. 76.68.59.180 (talk) 18:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)