User talk:76.69.75.41

Kamen Rider
Can you please stop claiming that the changes Darkness made had consensus on the talk page? I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that he undid changes Ryulong had made, the whole idea that this is relevant to Ryulong at all is kinda stupid, because the discussion on the talk page had nothing to do with what Darkness did. I can't vouch for why the admins did what they did, but as far as the animanga wikiproject is concerned, Darkness's edits were inappropriate because they violated the consensus policies on how to romanize names, not because of anything Ryulong was involved in.192.249.47.186 (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I legitimately don't understand how you can argue I'm not sure where people are getting the idea that he undid changes Ryulong had made, the whole idea that this is relevant to Ryulong at all is kinda stupid, because the discussion on the talk page had nothing to do with what Darkness did above, and then That he's done gone to revert Ryulong's edits immediately after taking a two year hiatus, then returning to frequently demand sanctions against Ryulong, while misrepresenting what the project consensus was, does not speak well to whether he was editing in good faith. on Darkness' talk page.


 * There are two separate changes Darkness made, one adding translations (against consensus) and one correcting the spelling of English words that the show transliterated into katakana (which shouldn't even require a discussion, but seems to have been very much supported by the consensus, Ryulong notwithstanding). As for the animanga project, who cares? I don't see a This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animanga banner on the talk page. I do see a This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tokusatsu banner, so they're the community whose consensus is relevant. 76.69.75.41 (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Bernstein (scientist) (February 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Bernstein (scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:76.69.75.41 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Missvain&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:76.69.75.41 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Bernstein (scientist)


Hello, 76.69.75.41. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Mark Bernstein".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 06:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)